Jump to content
  • Luuk Jacobs
    Luuk Jacobs

    Sign in to follow this  

    What effect will the Gender Pay Gap legislation have?

    Spring 2017 saw the introduction of a new and significant form of reporting on the Gender Pay Gap which will have wider implications for the evolution of the workplace and workforce.

     

    The new legislation requires employers with 250 or more employees to publish statutory calculations every year showing how large the pay gap is between their male and female employees independent of position. As a result, this will have a positive knock on effect of increasing gender equality in senior positions.

     

    Equal Pay and Gender Pay Gap

    First, don’t be confused about these two terms; Equal Pay and Gender Pay, they mean two very different things. Equal pay deals with the pay differences between individuals who do the same or similar jobs, or work of equal value. It’s unlawful to pay people unequally because they are a man or a woman therefore companies should ensure there is absolute equal pay for equal position.

     

    The gender pay gap however shows the differences in the average pay between all men and women in a company. If a workplace has a particularly high gender pay gap, this indicates there may be a number of inequality issues to deal with, and the individual calculations may help to identify what those issues are.

     

    Where are we now?

    The current UK gender pay gap is 18.1% and is at its lowest level ever (Justine Greening, UK minister for women and equalities). There is however a significant difference in industries and for example the figure for financial services is 39.5% (Elexica March 30, 2017).

     

    Before however jumping to conclusions, let’s try to understand how the calculations work.  The base calculations are:

    • the hourly pay rates of all male full-pay relevant employees divided by the number of male full-pay employees and the same number for female full-pay relevant employees (ie the mean)
    • equally from the above data, the difference between the midpoints in the ranges of men’s and women’s pay (ie the median)

     

    You can reach the final figure by calculating the difference between the male and female pay, divided by the male pay and multiply it by 100.

     

    Put simply, if in an Asset Management firm, there are 10 female secretaries earning £10 per hour and 10 male fund managers earning £25 per hour, there is a mean pay gap of 60%. For Asset Management this figure is likely to be even higher for the bonus mean.

     

    What happens next?

    With the first official reporting due in April 2018, when companies publish their data and narrative, the possible course of action they will commit to in order to make the gender pay gap smaller will make very interesting reading.

     

    As we’ve already stated, equal pay for equal positions is bound by law, so it follows the main attribute of the gender pay gap is the way it highlights the unequal distribution of men and women in senior positions. Within the regulation, companies have the opportunity to further explain in a narrative the main reasons for the gender pay gap and this is likely to confirm this view.

     

    How do we solve this inequality?

    We are seeing an increasing number of women in senior positions through either (equal or even fast track) career progression or actively hiring women in more senior positions. With the last not a real macro solution as it would only reduce the pay gap in one company at the cost of the other.

     

    Research has already shown that career progression of women is often cut short by parental leave, care for parents as well as children (www.ILO.org “Women at Work, trends 2016”). So there need to be other elements tackled in parallel, and outside of the workplace, to ensure that women progress to higher paid (more senior) positions. Some solutions supporting this would be a comprehensive approach to harmonise work and family responsibilities by way of the introduction of (the legal possibility of) shared parental leave, free childcare either through government or companies direct and flexible working arrangements.

     

    What does the future hold?

    The Women’s Business Council has stated that by equalising the economic participation rates of men and women, the UK would add 10% to the size of the economy by 2030.

     

    What is not clear is the roadmap we need to take to reach this goal. It will be several years before the impact of the Gender Pay Gap reporting regulation becomes truly visible, what the key drivers for change are and also which companies are leading the charge.

     

    There is no doubt these leaders of change and reform will also be the most attractive to a changing (millennial) work force and it will be interesting to see what measures they take. The gender pay gap, or should we say “gender equality”, raises a further question on the increasing diversity of the workforce. In the next wave of regulation, should this reporting be extended to for example ethnicity, age, marital status or even sexuality? And would companies be willing to show this without regulation or at a minimum be willing to discuss it in the Board room?

     

    Only time will tell, but the first slew of reports published next year will reveal a reality which has been long hidden and hopefully shine a light on the road towards evolution in the workplace.



    Sign in to follow this  

    Share this  

    Member Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.


  • Our picks

    • I've been trying to track down details on that statement from the CBI, but I'm not sure they elaborated on what the "unintended consequences" could be - I assume one could be wage inflation due to reduction in the negotiation advantage of the employer.
       
      Whether this is a bad thing is debatable when (by some measures) wage growth has been stagnant in the UK for longer than any time since the Napoleonic wars..
       
      Reality Check: Is pay growth the worst since Napoleon?
      WWW.BBC.CO.UK Reality Check examines the claim that real-wage growth is at its worst since the 18th Century.  
    • How do we solve the the Asset Management industry issues of today and tomorrow?
       
      We think we might just have the answer.
       
      When we created AlgoMe, we set out to empower professionals so they can manage their careers through technology, data and industry insight. With our career management platform, we‘ve delivered this but we know there‘s much more to be done.
       
      The Asset Management industry is in a state of flux. Right now lower fees, higher costs, new technology and increasing regulation, along with changes to the workforce, mean we need access to technology, data and industry insight more than ever before. This is why we‘re taking an exciting step by opening AlgoMe Community, the place that brings the Asset Management industry together to drive open conversation and essential innovation.
       
      AlgoMe Community is a members-only community exclusive to the industry and associated professions.
       
      Membership is free, members are verified and use their own names to create a profile – here are the key benefits:
       
      1. A community for Asset Management
      We have created a standalone space for asset managers meaning discussions and groups are centred around highly relevant areas and get to the heart of issues quickly. We will also be hosting regular events both online and offline to address industry challenges and help our members drive the agenda.
       
      2. Keep your finger on the pulse
      Not sure about Brexit or SMCR? Want to know what the latest research on AI is? The AlgoMe Community gives you direct access to all of these discussions. AlgoMe is working with a number of partner organisations to bring you the latest thought leadership, insights, blog posts and white papers to keep you abreast of the latest trends in Asset Management.
       
      3. Grow Your connections outside of your existing network
      There are a lot of bright minds out there. Over 40,000* people are currently working within the Asset Management industry according to the Investment Association. This number is likely to be 200k+ across Europe with the firms and organisations that make up Asset Management ecosystem. That’s a lot of new connections to make.
       
      4. Grow your personal brand
      Building your personal brand is critical to a successful career. AlgoMe Community gives you a platform to build your credibility and authority among your peers. It’s also easy to start your own blog to get ideas a wider audience and build up a following of other members.
       
      Join AlgoMe Community for free today and connect with the Asset Management industry.
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • Revolt announced it will be offering ETFs to its customers....
      http://igniteseurope.com/c/2090843/247783/revolut_offering_bound_appeal_investors?referrer_module=emailMorningNews&module_order=3&code=WTI5c2FXNHVibWRBWVd4bmIyMWxMbU52YlN3Z01UQTROemN5TURRc0lERXlNVFV4TkRjMk5EWT0
      • 2 replies
  • Welcome to AlgoMe Community

    Join the community connecting the Investment Management industry and get access to insights, discussions and events.

    Sign up for free today.

  • Categories

  • Similar Content

    • Andy Milner
      By Andy Milner
      An interesting article from the New York Times on the importance of mentoring. It highlights the fact that having a mentor is less common than it used to be, which reflects AlgoMe's view due to the move away from traditional career structures and ladders.
       
      Why Mentoring Matters, and How to Get Started - The New York Times
      WWW.NYTIMES.COM Professional mentorships used to be the workplace norm, but today they’re hard to find, even though they matter more than ever. Here’s how to find one, and how to get the most from it.  
    • Luuk Jacobs
      By Luuk Jacobs
      With the dust on the Gender Pay Gap Reporting just settling down, and clearly a lot of work to be done as a result, the UK is bracing itself for the next legislation around Pay Gaps. This time around it’s the turn of the CEO. UK listed companies must publish and justify the Pay Gap between Chief Executives and their staff from 2020 and explain how future share price rises will affect executive pay.
       
      In 2018, corporate America already made public a data point it would probably rather keep under wraps: how much CEOs make in comparison to their (global) employees.
       
      Pay Ratio Reporting will force UK listed companies with over 250 employees to reveal and “justify” the difference between how much top executives are paid compared with the average pay of their UK workforce (and in that it is different from the US where companies have to disclose their “Pay Ratios,” or the CEO’s compensation divided by the (global) median employee’s).
      Companies will also have to publish a narrative explaining changes to the pay ratio from year to year and to set the ratio into context of pay and conditions across the workforce.
       
      Subject to Parliamentary approval, this will come into effect from 1 January 2019, and companies will have to start reporting their Pay Ratios in 2020.
       
      What is the objective?
      One may ask what the exact objective of this law is. Has it been created as a tool to name and shame individuals and companies, or is it about reaching ratio that is considered to be reasonable? There are other questions as well.
      What will the justification of the ratio really mean, and how and who is to challenge it; is this the employee, the shareholder or even the government?
       
      What factors are to be taken into account to define what reasonable is?
      Of course, with all change there is risk. One could easily argue executive roles come with intrinsic high risk themselves; that of succeeding at the task. Being offered a remuneration package not reflecting this due to keeping in line with a certain (median) executive versus staff remuneration ratio, would potentially drive the best candidates away.
       
      Is it a rush to the average?
      Some data shows it would take the average UK full-time worker on a salary of £28,000 (median full-time earnings) 160 years to earn what an average FTSE 100 CEO is paid (£4.5 million) in just one year (CIPD estimates). The Equality Trust runs a very clever Pay Ratio tracker if you don’t believe me. Does this mean a ratio of 160 is the benchmark against which “reasonable” is measured? Is there room to be specific to company circumstances even if the public eye might say ‘but the average is 160’? Not currently as there seems to be no definition and no rationale either.
       
      James Jarvis, Corporate Governance Analyst at the Institute of Directors, said: “Ratios are a pretty blunt tool, which will generate plenty of heat but not necessarily much light on the issue of executive pay.”
       
      The role of the AGM
      In today’s world the Executive remuneration proposals are (or at least should already) be scrutinised every year through the AGM. Recent high profile cases where shareholders refused to approve the executive remuneration proposal (at the AGM of Persimmonin April 2018) or there was at least a rebellion against pay reports (AGM SHELLin May 2018) are a case in point.
       
      The role of the Board
      Following the recent Carillion scandal, ‘the board’ is in the spotlight which has led the IoD to call for tightening the rules around executive roles, responsibilities, and bonuses. This debate will rage on with strong arguments for and against.
       
      We are left without answers so far. With ‘the board’ already having the responsibility to review and challenge the right executive pay, is bringing the Pay Ratio a good move? It may appear in the public domain but is it really indicating the Board is not doing its job properly if there is no accepted mean or average?
       
      On the upside, this legislation may help bring about a better dialogue between boards and employees about the goals and aspirations of their business, and how pay is determined to achieve this shared vision.
    • Eva Keogan
      By Eva Keogan
      Asset Management is undergoing such a radical upheaval that the norms of yesteryear are long gone. A new paradigm is needed for success in this still burgeoning, though challenging Financial Services environment.
       
      Asset Management has historically been a sector with very low attrition and slow career progression. Senior management has tended to be in post for a considerable time. In the wider Financial Services industry, people are wanting to more proactively manage their careers and move from institution to institution in a shorter period of time. The ‘new career’ is not a life-long commitment to one particular firm or career route, and this is slightly out of kilter with the standard form within Asset Management.
       
      This is a big challenge for individuals. Line managers are still looking at how many different roles a candidate has had over the last ten years or so. They see three as a big issue, when in reality, that is not an issue in other sectors – moving around often results in candidates who have more diverse exposure to different topics and desired areas of expertise, and a better ability to learn and adapt. This characteristic plays directly into the ‘diversity of thought’ aspect of new external candidates, which is a direct benefit. On the other side, companies are now also having to adapt to the reality that knowledge is now more at risk of walking away.
       
      In terms of enabling these new career paths for Financial Services professionals, the onus is on the individual to ensure that they are up-to-date with knowledge and Continuous Professional Development (CPD).
       
      So how does this translate to any kind of career mobility or ‘gig economy’ evolution in Asset Management and its ecosystem?
      The ‘rumour market’ for new roles is highly fragmented. The candidate has to be in touch with a lot of head-hunters and recruiters to access the broad number of companies for which their talents and skill-sets may currently be in demand; the hunt becomes almost a job in itself.
       
      Traditional recruitment agencies are generally focused on specific industry sectors and not cross-fertilisation of external industry sector candidates. The established players do not tend to consider accumulated skills, or even aspirations to broaden a candidate’s career horizon, beyond that of their retrospective CV.  As a result, a valuable talent pool may be lost to the wider Financial Services sector due to recruitment agency’s inability to handle or manage the demands for ‘diversity of thought’ into sectors such as Asset Management. The candidate becomes more frustrated too.
       
      Job seekers using generic platforms such as LinkedIn, recruitment and head-hunting agencies are crying out for a smarter and relevant way to market their skillset to potential employers. The only way forward is to disrupt the status quo and innovate; this is where AlgoMe comes in. It’s a solution for industry players and outsiders who have valuable transferable skillsets, as well as the organisations who seek them.
       
      AlgoMe provides tools to tailor job searches and appointments to match specific needs and skillsets to potential employers using algorithms and smart technology. Additionally, it provides the access to mentoring and learning support on the platform too, creating a unique and new way for people to manage their careers now and in the future.
       
      New regulations such as MiFID II; agile management systems such as DevOps and SaaS; and changes in investment and distribution strategies (e.g. team-based investing) will transform Asset Management. It will move from a passive sector into a new burgeoning crucible of activity.
       
      The diversity of personnel set to enter the sector will create a paradigm shift in attitudes as well as systems and processes. This will make it a highly-attractive area for professionals to consider in their planned career moves around the Financial Services sector and possibly beyond. Making these life-changing transformations more successful is the remit of new smart tools such as those offered by AlgoMe, which is at the forefront of this paradigm shift making the search for a successful career move a lot easier than ever before.
×

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy with this. For further information, see our Privacy Policy.