Jump to content
  • Luuk Jacobs
    Luuk Jacobs

    Sign in to follow this  

    What effect will the Gender Pay Gap legislation have?

      Time to read: 6min

    Spring 2017 saw the introduction of a new and significant form of reporting on the Gender Pay Gap which will have wider implications for the evolution of the workplace and workforce.

     

    The new legislation requires employers with 250 or more employees to publish statutory calculations every year showing how large the pay gap is between their male and female employees independent of position. As a result, this will have a positive knock on effect of increasing gender equality in senior positions.

     

    Equal Pay and Gender Pay Gap

    First, don’t be confused about these two terms; Equal Pay and Gender Pay, they mean two very different things. Equal pay deals with the pay differences between individuals who do the same or similar jobs, or work of equal value. It’s unlawful to pay people unequally because they are a man or a woman therefore companies should ensure there is absolute equal pay for equal position.

     

    The gender pay gap however shows the differences in the average pay between all men and women in a company. If a workplace has a particularly high gender pay gap, this indicates there may be a number of inequality issues to deal with, and the individual calculations may help to identify what those issues are.

     

    Where are we now?

    The current UK gender pay gap is 18.1% and is at its lowest level ever (Justine Greening, UK minister for women and equalities). There is however a significant difference in industries and for example the figure for financial services is 39.5% (Elexica March 30, 2017).

     

    Before however jumping to conclusions, let’s try to understand how the calculations work.  The base calculations are:

    • the hourly pay rates of all male full-pay relevant employees divided by the number of male full-pay employees and the same number for female full-pay relevant employees (ie the mean)
    • equally from the above data, the difference between the midpoints in the ranges of men’s and women’s pay (ie the median)

     

    You can reach the final figure by calculating the difference between the male and female pay, divided by the male pay and multiply it by 100.

     

    Put simply, if in an Asset Management firm, there are 10 female secretaries earning £10 per hour and 10 male fund managers earning £25 per hour, there is a mean pay gap of 60%. For Asset Management this figure is likely to be even higher for the bonus mean.

     

    What happens next?

    With the first official reporting due in April 2018, when companies publish their data and narrative, the possible course of action they will commit to in order to make the gender pay gap smaller will make very interesting reading.

     

    As we’ve already stated, equal pay for equal positions is bound by law, so it follows the main attribute of the gender pay gap is the way it highlights the unequal distribution of men and women in senior positions. Within the regulation, companies have the opportunity to further explain in a narrative the main reasons for the gender pay gap and this is likely to confirm this view.

     

    How do we solve this inequality?

    We are seeing an increasing number of women in senior positions through either (equal or even fast track) career progression or actively hiring women in more senior positions. With the last not a real macro solution as it would only reduce the pay gap in one company at the cost of the other.

     

    Research has already shown that career progression of women is often cut short by parental leave, care for parents as well as children (www.ILO.org “Women at Work, trends 2016”). So there need to be other elements tackled in parallel, and outside of the workplace, to ensure that women progress to higher paid (more senior) positions. Some solutions supporting this would be a comprehensive approach to harmonise work and family responsibilities by way of the introduction of (the legal possibility of) shared parental leave, free childcare either through government or companies direct and flexible working arrangements.

     

    What does the future hold?

    The Women’s Business Council has stated that by equalising the economic participation rates of men and women, the UK would add 10% to the size of the economy by 2030.

     

    What is not clear is the roadmap we need to take to reach this goal. It will be several years before the impact of the Gender Pay Gap reporting regulation becomes truly visible, what the key drivers for change are and also which companies are leading the charge.

     

    There is no doubt these leaders of change and reform will also be the most attractive to a changing (millennial) work force and it will be interesting to see what measures they take. The gender pay gap, or should we say “gender equality”, raises a further question on the increasing diversity of the workforce. In the next wave of regulation, should this reporting be extended to for example ethnicity, age, marital status or even sexuality? And would companies be willing to show this without regulation or at a minimum be willing to discuss it in the Board room?

     

    Only time will tell, but the first slew of reports published next year will reveal a reality which has been long hidden and hopefully shine a light on the road towards evolution in the workplace.



    Sign in to follow this  

    • Share this    
    Share this  

    Member Feedback



    Recommended Comments

    Be the first to comment.

    Become a member to read more and join the discussion

    Members can read and contribute to discussions

    Apply

    Register now for free access.

    Create your account

    Sign in

    Already a member? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Related Content

    • Andy Milner
      By Andy Milner
      Much has been written about the benefits of a diverse and inclusive working environment, in terms of improving productivity, increasing staff retention and harnessing the advantages that come with cognitive diversity.
       
      However, the Investment Management Industry still suffers from a perception as one of the more old fashioned and less inclusive parts of the City - despite recent advances such as an increasing involvement in Pride.
       
      As with any minority group, it’s important to listen to the real-world experiences of LGBT+ professionals to gain a better understanding of the issues they face, and the establishment of InterInvest, a LGBT+ network for Investment Management, has been a significant step is bringing this community together.
       
      The risk of any such network is that it becomes an echo chamber where good ideas are generated but fail to penetrate outside of.
       
      Earlier in October InterInvest took a step towards moving the conversation into the wider industry, by holding the first of their “Employee Lifecycle Forum” events, aimed at bringing recruiters, HR managers and others into the room.
       
      By not only discussing the state of LGBT+ diversity in the industry (thanks to a presentation by Matt Cameron from LGBT Great), but by using the time to bring mixed groups together to brainstorm ideas, the event felt like it had a real possibility of kick starting changes in the industry.
       
      Here’s to bringing more people in on the discussion.
    • Andy Milner
      By Andy Milner
      An interesting takeaway from a recent report suggests that instead of a "glass ceiling" it could be a "broken rung" at the first step of the management ladder that is more responsible for holding back gender diversity.
       
       

       
      Well worth a read:
       
      Women in the Workplace 2019: The State of Women in Corporate America
      LEANIN.ORG More women are rising to senior leadership. But to get to gender, companies need to focus their efforts at the first step up to manager—the "broken rung."  
    • Rob Carter
      By Rob Carter
      The topic of diversity in Investment Management is hard to avoid and the spectrum is expanding. We’ve chosen to highlight some of the recent developments which are highlighting these various facets. Gender Pay Gap, LGBT, recruitment and Class Pay Gap
       
       
      New report on Diversity shows stasis on Gender Pay Gap
       
      The PwC and Diversity Project report released this week ‘Time to get serious: If diversity is a business imperative, treat it like one’ makes for depressing reading. According to its findings; of the five sectors reporting the biggest gender pay gaps in 2018, only investment management failed to record an overall improvement. In addition, the Gender Pay Gap in the Investment Management sector has deteriorated, leading to the second worst performance across 22 business sectors analysed. While Gender pay reporting has brought the lack of diversity within the investment management industry into sharp focus and added weight to the voices calling for faster change there is little movement.
       
      The report lists four key action points for the industry to tackle the issue head on:
      Align strategy for promoting diversity and inclusion with business priorities Executive teams must set the tone for the organisation and ensure diversity and inclusion are recognised as business priorities Tackle scepticism Be honest - tell it like it is  
       
      LGBT Great gathers momentum with ambassador role
       
      LGBT History Month this February was marked by the government pledge of £2.6million towards 12 organisations working to improve the lives of LGBT in the UK as part of the LGBT Action Plan. In tandem, LGBT Great, the global investment industry organisation working to develop all aspects of LGBT+ equality and inclusion within the workplace launched its #50for50 campaign which brings together 50 industry champions.
       
      It has just announced Colette Comerford’s appointment as Lead Role Model Ambassador. She will be working with LGBT Great’s Leadership Team to engage and inspire Role Models in the investment and savings industry across the globe. Anyone interested in joining the Role Model team should contact: info@lgbtgreat.com
       
       
      St James’s Place under fire for sexism in recruitment
       
      Incentives and freebies are often frowned up in the industry especially as there are rules and regulations around inducements. However when it comes to recruitment they can be very controversial. 

      According to a report by Investment Week, St James's Place (SJP) ‘has been accused of using dated stereotypes in its efforts to try and attract women to its academy’.

      SJP set up a 'Fashioning a New Career' recruitment event for women which included 45 minutes of browsing at Harvey Nichols, a 30-minute fashion and beauty presentation and complimentary mini beauty treatments.
       
      The article goes on to quote Catherine Morgan, Money Panel founder and qualified financial planner, who said to Investment week ‘if SJP truly wanted to attract more women into the sector, it should be talking about things such as flexible working and supporting women in their careers when they have a family. She described the evening as "dated" and "very stereotypical"’. 

       ISJ Independent Financial Planning Chartered financial planner Lena Patel was also quoted: "It's not all high heels and shoes, is it? [SJP advisers] are normal people that are doing their job. They are parents or mums that are working. It'll turn off so many women."
       
       
      The Investment Association Social Mobility Report

      In a newly released report, Tackling the Class Ceiling - Recognising potential over polish, the Investment Association throws down the gauntlet in a bid to highlight lack of social mobility in the industry and ways to tackle it.
       
      It starts by laying out the issues facing the industry and people within it today with some stark findings such as:
      Business as usual: Social and cultural capital are still in play in the industry. Access to social networks and family connections increase the chances of successfully landing a good job while employers may have a desire to recruit for familiarity or similarity Privilege pays more: A ‘class pay gap’ exists with people from privileged backgrounds working in finance reckoned to earn £17,500 a year more than people in the same industry from working class backgrounds Gender and race inequality: Black British women from working-class backgrounds are liable to earn an average of £20,000 less than white men from more privileged backgrounds  
      Read the full report here
       
    • Andy Milner
      By Andy Milner
      Are these two sides of the same coin? Is there importance in considering them separately?
       
      @Jonathan Max - was interested to reread your blog post. Any thoughts on this?
       
       
    • Jonathan Max
      By Jonathan Max
      When it comes to measuring diversity, organisations typically begin with data that illustrates progress with inherent diversity (i.e. traits people are both with)– recruiting slates comprised of minority candidates, ratios of females-to-males in leadership roles, Gender Pay Gap etc. 
       
      We also know that Diversity and innovation move together; this is more than just increasing numbers but by harnessing cognitive diversity; that is how people from different background and life experiences may look at a problem or situation.
       
      As business challenges become ever more complex; leveraging cognitive diversity can be a key differentiator for an organisation. With the key focus on ‘moving the dial’ (on whatever diversity metric) how much attention is being spent on creating the culture and mentality of openness to challenge and change; the very essence of what is needed to innovate?
       
      @Paul Aldrich @Andrew Pullman - any thoughts from your forthcoming book?
       
       
Debug
Debug info:
You may be asked to provide the below information to an AlgoMe administrator if you are facing any problems with the app:
appcms
modulepages
controllerpage
topics/forum ID31
page ID
PHP user agentCCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/)
ThemeAlgoMe v2.1.5
Mobile appNO
Member ID
×

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy with this. For further information, see our Privacy Policy.