Jump to content
  • Featured
    Eva Keogan
    Eva Keogan

    Sign in to follow this  

    We need Gender Pay Gap reporting - equal pay is not working

    This year’s Gender Pay Gap reports are now largely in the public domain. Financial Services and Investment Management is showing a very wide gap, if not wider than before. Much of the impact of this is being lost in the chaos of Brexit right now. Let’s hope 2020 see us in better shape, but first let’s look at what is driving the debate.

     

    There are a lot of column inches and clever graphics dedicated to the Gender Pay Gap in the media and the comment section on the myriad articles is lively to say the least. The majority of men seem to say equal pay is law and the Gender Pay Gap reporting is misleading. According to the male contingent, it’s complicated, messy, requires counter intuitive thinking and reasoning, does not on the surface appear logical, so it’s not fit for purpose. 

     

    I disagree.

     

    Gender Pay Gap reporting has been designed to eke out gender imbalance in the workplace by highlighting the way women take on roles which pay less. This is quite worrying, especially since women reach the same level of education.

     

    Equal Pay in law is still not working. There are also many instances of ‘equal pay’ not being honoured – you have only to look at the recent BBC scandal to see it writ large.

     

    And this is what we’re up against as women in the workforce – legislation is now in place but it’s not being accepted or acted upon.

    Interestingly, I think this paragraph from Grazia, a fashion and lifestyle magazine, sums it all up rather well from the female perspective.

     

    Quote

    17 Reasons Why The Gender Pay Gap Exists - Unsurprisingly, knowing about it isn't fixing it... by Nell Frizzell
    The Gender Pay Gap, like a fatberg, is made up of many different unsavoury factors. The wet wipes, congealed oil and earbuds that come together to block the career progression and financial security of women in work are manifold; misogyny, the price of child care, recruitment, homosocial work culture, graduate schemes, maternity leave, the awarding of bonuses, the character of low paid work, social conditioning, squeamishness and bad old fashioned bias.


    What does the future hold for the new generation?
    If there is no flexibility or new room made to accommodate gender and diversity, where are we headed? Here are some of my thoughts on what’s to come

     

    Change is going to happen: The ‘glass ceiling’ is still very much in existence but the workplace is destined to change. The Women in Finance Charter is creating progress. New regulation and law will ensure progress (unless it is revoked, which in the UK is extremely unlikely). One hindrance maybe the withdrawal of the UK from the EU which sets us apart from the rulebook we currently abide by. Whatever happens, change is the norm but it’s not going to be quick.

     

    Jobs for the girls: While we are seeing more working women and mothers, I think we will continue to see a reduction in women who want primarily to be home makers and steer away from careers. Changes to the education agenda and generations of women who have had successful careers will normalise careers and family. 2018 ONS figures show a marked change in data which support this.

     

    1. The employment rate for mothers was 74.0% in April to June 2018, which has increased from 68.9% in 2013 and from 61.9% in 1996 (when comparable records began).
    2. Since 2010, the employment rate for women with children has remained higher than for women without dependent children, whilst the employment rate for fathers has consistently been higher than for men without dependent children.
    3. 5 in 10 (50.5%) mothers work 30 or more hours in their usual working week (excluding overtime) compared with almost 7 in 10 (69.7%)women without dependent children.
    4. In April to June 2018, almost three-quarters (72.5%) of families with couple parents had both parents in employment; of these families, almost half (45.5%) had both parents in full-time employment.

     

    Women will champion themselves: There are networking groups and awards specifically set up for women in the City. However, at various milestones, women have extremely different needs in the workplace. Gender specific issues such as breastfeeding, menopause and other previously taboo subjects are on the agenda for the workplace now and the conversation needs to continue so there is a supportive environment. This will probably embody itself in female only forums and discrete problem solving groups rather than large campaigns.

     

    Disruption is on its way: Like it or not, with a growing workforce of highly educated women the status quo will be challenged, and it will be down to two developments. First, new technologies such as AI which are set to replace menial roles – which women are filling more than men - will lead to retraining and up-skilling. These will likely be new roles which are client facing or project managing technology.

    Second, as companies such as Tesco, Oracle and Google are facing class action from women due to pay and discrimination, it is highly likely to follow in the Investment Management industry, possibly on a global rather than local level. This will no doubt go back decades rather than years and will not be pleasant either. 

     

    Fragmentation in the market: As women become more of a power in the workforce, it’s quite likely they will want to work on their own terms. This will more likely mean they will not want to work in prevalently male environments which do not accommodate them, their growing families and pressures on work life balance. Technology has changed the need to be present in the office and virtual teams are acceptable. Network marketing and franchises are quite popular for women with families who work outside the industry – this proven model would be interesting to apply to Investment Management, so expect to see micro businesses which will be small teams and even the resurgence of the family firm.

     

    While the 2019 Gender Pay Gap is not showing much progress today, it is early days. Equal pay and bonuses will continue to dominate the Investment Management career agenda and the broader world of work. I think we will see activist shareholders push for fair and equal conditions for all, including all other groups in the diversity spectrum as well, but that’s another story.

    • Like 3


    Sign in to follow this  

    Share this  

    Member Feedback



    Recommended Comments

    Luuk Jacobs

    Posted

    I think Nell Frizzell's comparison is spot on and says it quite bluntly and equally as @Eva Keogan states there is change on the horizon ......

    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Share this  

    Become a member to read more and join the discussion

    Members can read and contribute to discussions

    Apply

    Register now for free access.

    Create your account

    Sign in

    Already a member? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • With the decorations up, the last order date for Amazon nigh and most of us looking forward to at least a few days break, it’s always a good time to take stock of what’s been achieved over the last 12 months.
       
      For AlgoMe this has been another exciting year.
       
      January started in style with the launch of the AlgoMe Careers mobile app – giving professionals the opportunity to find their next career opportunity on the move.
       
      Then in July we released our Industry Pulse Report – a check on what the industry was thinking about key topics such as Brexit, Pay Gap Reporting, MiFiD II and GDPR. Unfortunately it seems that the uncertainty that the industry was feeling due to Brexit is unlikely to have receded in the intervening period, but it’s good to see progress starting to be made in other areas such as gender and diversity.
       
      In September we launched AlgoMe Community – a place for the Investment / Asset Management industry to come together, providing professionals with ways to grow their knowledge, profile and network. We’d like to say a big thank you to all of the members that have joined and contributed and look forward to continuing growth in 2019.
       
      In November AlgoMe joined the Investment Association, becoming a Fintech member and working closely with Velocity, the Association’s new Fintech accelerator. This is a really exciting initiative and we’re looking forward to doing more with Velocity in the near future.
       
      We also launched our Mentoring matching service in November – designed to help AlgoMe Community members connect with the best individuals within the community to help them to reach their career goals using a simple but intelligent process. If you haven’t already signed up to be a mentor or a mentee, please do spend 5 minutes now and tick off a New Year’s Resolution early.
       
      As we go into the end of the year, we have also launched our survey on Investment Management, Fintech and the future of careers. The impact of Fintech on the industry is going to accelerate rapidly in 2019, but what has been less well documented is the impact on individuals, their careers and the skills they’ll need to succeed in a more digitised environment. We really value the input of our community members, so please spend a couple of minutes filling out the survey and we’ll make sure you’re the first to hear the results early next year.
       
      From me and the AlgoMe team, I wish you all a very happy holiday season and look forward to another year of exciting announcements and change in 2019.
       
      Rob
       
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • I have always struggled to see a fair reason why employers should be allowed to ask about a potential hire’s current remuneration, other than to give them an advantage in pay negotiations.
      It’s something which can only exacerbate existing pay inequalities and  it’s abolishment can surely only be a positive thing.
      Here the Guardian argues specifically about its impact with regards to the gender pay gap:
      https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/23/gender-pay-gap-current-salary-question
      I believe this has already been outlawed in some US states?
      @Jonathan Max - would be interesting to hear the view from HR. 
      • 10 replies
    • The Investment Association recently gave the industry a boost when it announced the launch of Velocity, its FinTech accelerator.  Designed to identify, develop and accelerate best in class firms with innovative solutions, Velocity will champion and facilitate the wider adoption of technology across the industry.
       
      And AlgoMe will be involved in this too, which is why I’m excited to announce we are now a member organisation of the Investment Association as an official FinTech member and have been named a "company to watch" by Velocity.
       
      Challenging Times
      The Investment Management industry faces major challenges and opportunities from forces such as digital technology, pressure on fees and increased regulation, while at the same time there are widespread changes in the workforce and their expectations.
       
      To date, Investment Management has both been fairly insulated from the challenges posed by agile FinTech competitors, but also distant from the opportunities offered by the new technologies and ways of thinking that such companies bring.
       
      Bringing FinTech closer
      Velocity is a fantastic step towards accelerating the adoption of FinTech. It has received support and endorsements from both inside and outside the industry, including from the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Phillip Hammond, who was enthusiastic about the initiative at a recent City event.
       
      To drive change and innovation, the industry needs to connect across different disciplines and areas of expertise, driving new ways of thinking and fostering cultural change.
       
      Without the benefit of emerging FinTechs and their external expertise, it will be hard for incumbents to harness the benefits of emerging technologies such as Straight Through deal Processing (STP), Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in areas such as risk and compliance, securities trading and investment decision making.
       
      Our Mission
      AlgoMe's mission is to connect the Investment Management industry and empower professionals to manage their careers. Our new product, AlgoMe Community, is placed to become the hub for the discussion between FinTechs and the companies and professionals in the wider Investment Management ecosystem.
       
      Join AlgoMe Community today
       
      AlgoMe Community - community.algome.com
        • Like
      • 0 replies
  • Categories

  • Related Content

    • Eva Keogan
      By Eva Keogan
      Direct quote from Investment Week: The number of firms in the UK reporting their Gender Pay Gap (GPG) figures by the deadline has fallen by more than a thousand, amid claims firms have restructured businesses or transferred staff to avoid being obliged to report, or have ditched reporting altogether under the perception they will not face repercussions.
       
      Is anyone working for a company which has done this? Is it time to name and shame as has been threatened before? Your thoughts are welcome.
       
      This is quite worrying to read and it's not just Investment Week which has reported on this but to down size companies so they are below the 250-person threshold for reporting is incredibly cynical. Has anyone found evidence of this? Also, using Brexit as a smokescreen is not going to wash next year.
       
       
      Gender pay gap reporting falls as asset managers unveil mixed results
      WWW.INVESTMENTWEEK.CO.UK More than 1,000 fewer firms reveal figures  
    • Luuk Jacobs
      By Luuk Jacobs
      The Investment Association just published their report "CLOSING THE GAP: ADDRESSING THE GENDER PAY GAP" which in part 3 looks at the "Industry Initiatives for Change". A very welcome publication that gives a good summary of what our industry (although I would think any industry) can do to close the gap, concentrated around:
      Attraction and recruitment; Retention and advancement; and Monitoring  
      When reading it, I still come away with the feeling that it does not go beyond the standard and is not necessarily addressing cultural issues as indicated in my earlier blog or is moving away from the beaten path.    
      20190327-genderpaygapreport.pdf
    • Eva Keogan
      By Eva Keogan
      Nominations revealed for the 2019 Women in Investment Awards
      WWW.INVESTMENTWEEK.CO.UK Over 1,300 nominations received Great to see a long list of nominees here!
    • Eva Keogan
      By Eva Keogan
      My question for the community: Is the narrative, or lack of it, in the media around high profile professional women causing us harm? 
      The reason I"m asking is triggered by the JP Morgan leadership race earlier this month.
       
      While April has seen a lot of Gender Pay Gap reporting, there is another high profile story which has caught my eye but for all the wrong reasons. It is really interesting to see how the US narrative around women differs from the UK. However, the reason I'm putting Forbes, WSJ and Daily Mail together is I'm extremely surprised to find the UK business press did not mention this story at all, which was a major oversight in itself.
       
      So here is the example I am using to illustrate this - the JP Morgan story about its next CEO and how the two front runners are referred to: Forbes and WSJ are supportive while the Daily Mail is focusing on 'single motherhood' - is this necessary to identify a high level executive this way? It comes across as particularly snide and unnecessary but why didn't other publications cover it over here? Let me know your thoughts 
       
      Have a look at these three articles....
      Forbes sees women as leaders, WSJ as successors and the Daily Mail as single mother of three.
       
      1. Two women executives leading
       
      The Two Women Executives Leading JPMorgan Chase Into The Future
      WWW.FORBES.COM Marianne Lake and Jennifer Piepszak, the two women executives leading JPMorgan Chase into the future in two new two leadership roles and as potential successors to CEO James Dimon.  
       
      2. Wall Street Journal - women with decades of experience
       
      Two Female Executives Top Short List for Next JPMorgan Chief
      WWW.WSJ.COM JPMorgan Chase put two women with decades of experience at the bank at the top of the list to one day succeed James Dimon as chief executive.  
      3. Daily Mail - a single mother of three
       
      'First woman of Wall St' could be new boss of JPMorgan | Daily Mail Online
      WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK British-born Marianne Lake, 48, a single mother of three dubbed the 'first woman of Wall Street' has been tipped as a contender to succeed CEO James Dimon at JPMorgan Chase.  
       
Debug info for admin:
appcms
modulepages
controllerpage
topics/forum ID78
page ID
PHP user agentCCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/)
×

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy with this. For further information, see our Privacy Policy.