Jump to content
  • Eva Keogan
    Eva Keogan

    Sign in to follow this  

    MiFID II … are we there yet?

    The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) is regarded as one of the most significant and far reaching regulatory initiatives undertaken since the economic crisis of 2008 and the last ten years.

     

    In 2009, when the G20 committed to manage the risk associated with OTC derivatives trades, the European response was European Market Infrastructure Regulation “EMIR” (into effect as of August 16, 2012) and MiFID II. Eight years on, it’s pretty reasonable to ask – are we there yet?

     

    MiFID II was originally scheduled to come into place as off January 2017. Due to concerns over the tight timeframe to implement the directive, its complexity and the necessity to build IT infrastructure systems, the implementation date was delayed a further year to January 3, 2018. Where previous regulatory changes often had a phase in period, MiFID II is a kind of ‘big bang’.

     

    MiFID II is going to impact the overall business. From transaction reporting, product governance, general inducement rule and unbundling of research to best execution and market infrastructure, its aim is to reshape the European capital markets. The impact will be felt way beyond Europe. For example, third country firms providing investment services or activities in the EU will have to submit transaction reports to the regulator which authorised them.

     

    What are some of the key challenges companies are and have been facing when implementing MiFID II?

     

    Data management

    The financial services industry is known for its legacy systems and challenges it faces in handling the multitude of data needed to comply with the requirements of MiFID II. Fit for purpose IT systems are easier said than done. This very thing has already caused significant headaches for many companies even for what is considered to be the “simplest” increase of client reporting with now 65 data fields instead of previously 29. It is not only the increase of data which is a challenge, but equally the correctness of data when extrapolated from legacy systems or in general.

     

    Adequate oversight and governance

    According to Don Scott, Director, KPMG Regulatory Advisory Services in the recently published report ‘MiFID II The Time To Act Is Now’, “industry practice will continue to change until a market standard has evolved”.

     

    But MiFID II has far reaching oversight and governance changes. Within the product management cycle, manufacturers and distributors become both responsible for ensuring that investment products are distributed to a target market of end clients. This does not stop with the design, development and launch of a product but needs continuous oversight throughout the life cycle of a product. The responsibility lies with the manufacturer as well as the distributor to prove products are and have been distributed to the target market. Equally they need to prove clients remain fitting the target audience and this is achieved through ongoing verification of the suitability of the clients profile.

     

    Equally, the responsibility of companies for showing they have adhered to “best execution” of trades has changed from taking “reasonable steps“ to “all sufficient steps”. This previously applied to equity asset classes and has now been extended to non-equity asset classes combined with a significant reporting obligation on where these trades have been executed. Clearly this will bring significant challenges for companies to show and “evidence” their compliance, not on a trade by trade basis, but through a robust set up of processes, procedures and governance over it. A 2016 asset management market study by the FCA has highlighted that investment managers are still failing to ensure effective oversight of best execution.

     

    Accountability and conduct

    This is most felt through the inducement rule and the unbundling of investment research and execution. Some EU countries already banned commission payments for retail clients (UK, Retail Distribution Review) with MiFID II making this more generally prohibited across the EU to avoid conflicts of interest.

     

    The unbundling of investment research and execution aligns very much with the rule of “best execution” of trades and sets clear rules for when investment firms use “broker commission” to pay for research. Ultimately it is up to the investment firm to show that the research which is being paid for from broker commission is to the benefit of the investor.

     

    Transparency

    Creating transparency of the overall financial market aims to better understand, from a macro point of view, the risk(s) that investment markets in general pose to the stability of the financial markets and as such better protect investors. Reporting requirements are increased and broadened significantly and the capital markets playing field is made more balanced by bringing more asset classes and instruments within a regulated market environment as well as tightening the rules around it.

     

    So are we there yet?

    While this weighty agenda has been with us now for some time, the implementation date of January 3, 2018 is clearly not the end date of MiFID II.

     

    The rules will continue to be interpreted and understood and therefore develop and evolve.  Looking back at MiFID I – which came in to play in April 30, 2004 and into national law as of January 31, 2007 – it’s fair to say there have been ongoing developments ever since. MiFID II and its outcomes will therefore very likely also impact companies and markets alike and remain on our collective agendas over the next five to ten years.



    Sign in to follow this  

    Share this  

    Member Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.


  • Our picks

    • I've been trying to track down details on that statement from the CBI, but I'm not sure they elaborated on what the "unintended consequences" could be - I assume one could be wage inflation due to reduction in the negotiation advantage of the employer.
       
      Whether this is a bad thing is debatable when (by some measures) wage growth has been stagnant in the UK for longer than any time since the Napoleonic wars..
       
      Reality Check: Is pay growth the worst since Napoleon?
      WWW.BBC.CO.UK Reality Check examines the claim that real-wage growth is at its worst since the 18th Century.  
    • How do we solve the the Asset Management industry issues of today and tomorrow?
       
      We think we might just have the answer.
       
      When we created AlgoMe, we set out to empower professionals so they can manage their careers through technology, data and industry insight. With our career management platform, we‘ve delivered this but we know there‘s much more to be done.
       
      The Asset Management industry is in a state of flux. Right now lower fees, higher costs, new technology and increasing regulation, along with changes to the workforce, mean we need access to technology, data and industry insight more than ever before. This is why we‘re taking an exciting step by opening AlgoMe Community, the place that brings the Asset Management industry together to drive open conversation and essential innovation.
       
      AlgoMe Community is a members-only community exclusive to the industry and associated professions.
       
      Membership is free, members are verified and use their own names to create a profile – here are the key benefits:
       
      1. A community for Asset Management
      We have created a standalone space for asset managers meaning discussions and groups are centred around highly relevant areas and get to the heart of issues quickly. We will also be hosting regular events both online and offline to address industry challenges and help our members drive the agenda.
       
      2. Keep your finger on the pulse
      Not sure about Brexit or SMCR? Want to know what the latest research on AI is? The AlgoMe Community gives you direct access to all of these discussions. AlgoMe is working with a number of partner organisations to bring you the latest thought leadership, insights, blog posts and white papers to keep you abreast of the latest trends in Asset Management.
       
      3. Grow Your connections outside of your existing network
      There are a lot of bright minds out there. Over 40,000* people are currently working within the Asset Management industry according to the Investment Association. This number is likely to be 200k+ across Europe with the firms and organisations that make up Asset Management ecosystem. That’s a lot of new connections to make.
       
      4. Grow your personal brand
      Building your personal brand is critical to a successful career. AlgoMe Community gives you a platform to build your credibility and authority among your peers. It’s also easy to start your own blog to get ideas a wider audience and build up a following of other members.
       
      Join AlgoMe Community for free today and connect with the Asset Management industry.
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • Revolt announced it will be offering ETFs to its customers....
      http://igniteseurope.com/c/2090843/247783/revolut_offering_bound_appeal_investors?referrer_module=emailMorningNews&module_order=3&code=WTI5c2FXNHVibWRBWVd4bmIyMWxMbU52YlN3Z01UQTROemN5TURRc0lERXlNVFV4TkRjMk5EWT0
      • 2 replies
  • Welcome to AlgoMe Community

    Join the community connecting the Investment Management industry and get access to insights, discussions and events.

    Sign up for free today.

  • Categories

  • Similar Content

    • Rob Carter
      By Rob Carter
      MiFID II is arguably the biggest regulatory shakeup to hit the asset management industry since the Retail Distribution Review.
       
      The refreshed version of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive is a huge piece of legislation from Europe which came into force in January this year. It is designed to protect investors and push the financial services industry towards greater transparency.
       
      What’s changing?
      MiFID II has the potential to reshape the Financial Services landscape, with changes affecting all asset classes and institutions from banks and brokers to Asset Managers and pension funds.
       
      Among its main tenets are stricter rules around suitability, especially in relation to complex products, better transparency around trading, changing the remit of rules to include commodity derivatives, stricter controls on algorithmic trading, and limits on the size of trades that can be made in so-called ‘dark pools’ (private stock markets or trading forums used by institutional investors).
       
      Research and MiFID II
      MiFID II’s emphasis on itemising and disclosing all costs to clients has implications for firms’ distribution strategies. One rule which has particular significance for Asset Managers concerns the way firms deal with research. Under MiFID II, firms have to charge clients separately for analyst research, for example, on companies or sectors, rather than bundling the cost in with other services.
       
      Firms have been struggling to decide the right course of action as they try to balance profitability against customer service.
       
      Asset management giant Fidelity International recently did a U-turn on its policy on third party research. When it first announced its plans in October 2017, the group had planned to pass the costs of external research on to clients in a bid to be more flexible and transparent, while reducing its base management fee in order to offset the cost. The idea was to make sure all clients were treated equally, regardless of whether they were captured by MiFID II regulation or not. But, in February this year, it decided this was not in the best interests of clients, and it would instead absorb research costs itself. This brings it in line with the rest of the industry and ensures its clients will not be singled out to face “disproportionate operational and reporting consequences”, which could also make Fidelity look less competitive.
       
      Adrian Lowcock, investment director at Architas, said most Asset Managers are now on the same page in how they plan to handle research under MiFID II, but noted the industry could still face unexpected consequences as a result.
      “It is good to see that the industry has reached a consensus approach which should make it easier and cheaper to access funds. However, the long-term impact of absorbing research costs is still unknown and could result in unforeseen consequences, so fund groups, advisers and researchers need to remain vigilant to ensure this approach remains the right one for the industry and its clients.”
       
      One possible consequence could be cost-cutting to help fund groups and banks shoulder the cost of research, with potentially the loss of many analyst jobs. McKinsey & Co has estimated that the $4bn annual spend on research by the top 10 sell-side banks could drop 30% after MiFID II. However, the other side of the coin is that some groups, such as Schroders and Vanguard, are building up their in-house research teams so they can rely less on external sources.
       
      Regulatory landscape
      MiFID II is not the only legislation with which financial services firms have to contend. UCITS, PRIIPS and FATCA are among the other acronyms which could be giving industry executives sleepless nights, especially given the fact some aspects of these regulations overlap.
       
      Implementation and administrative costs so far may have burdened asset managers, and they may also face higher costs in future as their reporting requirements go up. Asset managers will no doubt slim down, adapt and innovate to cope with these latest changes, as they have always done, and the strongest will survive. If MiFID II achieves its laudable aim of making markets fairer and rebuilding investor trust in financial services, which is still lacking a decade on from the financial crisis, surely that can only be positive for the industry’s future.
    • Rob Carter
      By Rob Carter
      At AlgoMe, we’re very well acquainted with the Asset Management, Fintech and the wider Financial Services industries.  We understand how dynamic and exciting these areas are to work in and conversely, how the challenging factors such as regulation, Brexit and technology are creating new pressure points.
       
      According to The Investment Association there are currently 93,500 people employed in activities related either directly or indirectly to asset management – this is a significant community. The asset management industry alone directly employs 37,700 individuals at the end of 2016.
       
      More than ever before, professionals and organisations need to be working at peak performance; which means sustaining a productive and stable workforce. We asked ourselves, where are we right now? What are professionals thinking and how does this stack up against what they are experiencing at work?
       
      In order to uncover a true picture of where we are now, and how to overcome the challenges we all face, we undertook some extensive research and have just published the AlgoMe Career Satisfaction Benchmark Report.
       
      The report is a pulse check when it comes to working goals, ideals and motivation. The results have proved what we have been suspecting for a while – the workforce is changing and there are already fundamental gaps in expectations between employees and their employers.
       
      The report supports professionals and companies by helping them to understand how to manage their roles and ambitions successfully – especially when it comes to identifying needs and weak spots. Please enjoy the read and feel free to share this with your colleagues and HR.
       
      The AlgoMe Career Satisfaction Benchmark Survey is now out – download it now for great insights and advice
    • Guest
      By Guest
      Guest blog from Julia Kirkland, Senior Partner at FSTP
      If you don’t know already, which of course you do, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) is EU legislation which first came into effect in 2007. It was created to regulate firms providing services to their clients which are linked to ‘financial instruments’, these being shares, bonds, units in collective investment schemes and derivatives. In addition, it covers the venues where those ‘financial instruments’ are traded.
       
      Fast forward 10 years or so and we have an updated version – MiFID II. This includes the revised MiFID and a new Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR). January 3, 2018 is the day MiFID II must be implemented across Europe.
       
      Now we’re on the cusp of this deadline, the thorny and sensitive topic of Knowledge and Competence (K&C) is bubbling up as a major concern across the industry.  We’ve spoken with numerous firms in both the Asset Management and Wealth Management sectors and they have one thing in common; they’re all grappling with the assessment of competence of information providers.
       
      Who is in scope? 
      In Asset Management, this may cover a wide range of roles from sales teams, client services, broker servicing staff to Portfolio Managers (the really sensitive aspect of K&C). Managers may struggle with the fact they must tell a Portfolio Manager of 20 years plus who hasn’t got a formal qualification, they need to be assessed as competent and in a very short timeframe too.
       
      In Wealth, the scope may cover desk assistants, team secretaries and portfolio assistants who may all be in direct contact with clients, giving them information about prices, valuations, charges and providing generic market or sector views. Additionally, research teams who might attend meetings with clients to provide market, sector or stock views on a non-advised basis may fall under this too. Most of the firms we are speaking to are including research teams. Most of the above staff members have never been included in formal K&C Schemes before but this has changed.
       
      What happens in 2018?
      As it stands, information providers not assessed by January 3 will need to be supervised in their activities and oversight of any client interaction must be in place. If you’re not prepared, January 2018 is fast approaching and maybe it’s time to look outside your company for third party support and assistance.
       
      Our guest blogger Julia Kirkland, is Senior Partner, FSTP
      FSTP is a training solution provider with expertise in MiFID II and the company also runs workshops to cover Wealth and Asset Management to meet the ESMA requirements and provides advanced K&C assessments for more seasoned, professional staff.
×

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy with this. For further information, see our Privacy Policy.