Jump to content
  • Luuk Jacobs
    Luuk Jacobs

    Sign in to follow this  

    Looking ahead to 2019: The year of the B word

      Time to read: 3min

    2018 is nearing its end. It has in many ways again been an exhausting year for the Investment Management industry. It started with the delivery of MiFID II, followed by other regulatory requirements like Gender Pay Gap Reporting and GDPR as well as preparing for the next round of regulation that will hit in 2019.

     

    I however think that 2019 is going to be the year of the B word.

     

    Likely this will be most associated with BREXIT – and the lack of plan B. I don’t want this blog to become another discussion of it as it is all in the hands of UK parliament as to where this all will go. If as a company you have not done your risk assessment in respect of this, and mitigated the risk already with changes to your business set up (how small or large this might be), time is, or has, run out by now and you can only hope for a low impact outcome.

     

    There are however other B words that I believe will put their mark on 2019.

     

    BLOCKCHAIN (or should we start calling it Distributed Ledger Technology). Much has been spoken about it but relatively little has been used in the investment management industry so far. The term at least has now become a collective understanding of the technology with targeted solutions becoming available although the blockchain technology offerings remain nascent and immature. Equally research from Forrester anticipates 90% of blockchain pilots won’t become complete products or services. Despite all these challenges blockchain will remain on the agenda of many Boards and Executives, as you can’t afford not to understand what it will change to and in your industry in general and the benefits it could bring to your own company.

     

    This brings us on to BITCOIN, one of the best-known uses of blockchain. 2018 was literally a year of highs and lows for Crypto Currencies in general. If you believe specialists in the field, 2019 will see the entry of Institutional money entering crypto currency. The Nasdaq will launch cryptocurrencies in 2019 and various other trading platforms are preparing their launch (Cyprus, Gibraltar).
    It is said that Bitcoin, as indicator for the crypto market, “is and remains in its long-term bull market. Bitcoin trades in its “transition band” whereas going forward, as Bitcoin is maturing as an investment, it will not exceed its bullish band” (investingHaven, October 2018).

     

    Bringing us to BOX and more specific sandbox; the technology and software testing environment that enables the isolated execution of software or programs for independent evaluation, monitoring or testing. This is becoming standard practice in business, and even the FCA, to test ideas to resolve the challenges that are being faced without directly making choices. It is bringing us all back to the days when we were at kindergarten playing in the sandbox, being creative, free spirited and thinking, leading to creating better together. 2019 will see sandbox being applied more broadly beyond technology.

     

    The last B word will be the BANK OF ENGLAND and its regulatory arm the PRA and FCA. Various regulation will need to be implemented in 2019, most notably and far reaching the Senior Manager Certification Regime (“SMCR”) and the Asset Management Market Study (“AMMS”). Both will not just be a challenge for the investment management industry to comply with but equally will change culture and governance on an unprecedented scale. 


     

    Edited by Luuk Jacobs

    • Like 3


    Sign in to follow this  

    Share this  

    Member Feedback



    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.

    Become a member to read more and join the discussion

    Members can read and contribute to discussions

    Apply

    Register now for free access.

    Create your account

    Sign in

    Already a member? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Related Content

    • Jonathan Max
      By Jonathan Max
      Here is what is on mind; as the nonsense in parliament continues, are we merely between a rock and a hard place or to be coined 'hard Brexit'?
      Thoughts please
    • Jonathan Max
      By Jonathan Max
      ^ Vote in the poll above ^
       
      What does PM Boris Johnson Mean For Markets?
      WWW.MORNINGSTAR.CO.UK The new UK Prime Minister is expected to cut taxes and boost spending, but a lack of clarity on Brexit is holding back UK shares...  
      In theory....Boris' promise of lower taxes and increasing government spending could be good news for certain sectors such as housing. 
       
      The rather large elephant in the room however is a rather simplistic view of Brexit with a further extension or general election perhaps more likely than a 31 October departure....
       
    • Lydia Francis
      By Lydia Francis
      The following is a brief overview of the Treasury Select Committee meeting with the Financial Conduct Authority on 25th June 2019.
       

       
      Woodford Investment Management
      Unsurprisingly, the highly anticipated subject of Woodford Investment Management’s (WIM) shortcomings was the first topic for discussion at the meeting.
       
      The following observations are FSTP’s own view of the possible implications of Woodford Investment Management’s demise (we still don’t know what we don’t know and feel this subject has got some distance to run before all the facts are known).
       
      Key points:
      This failure of a retail fund will have serious and lasting impact on the operation of Asset Management in the UK.
      It throws into sharp relief the requirements falling out of the FCA’s Asset Management Market Study, in particular the need for independent Non-Executive Directors (NED) to challenge at Authorised Fund Manager (AFM) level and the production of qualitative value for money statements for all UK funds.
       
      From what we heard, we suspect there will be changes to the rules governing the liquidity of funds which retail investors are able to invest in. Andrew Bailey (FCA’s CEO) highlighted the Regulator’s view that European Union (EU) legislation has failed to manage retail funds. However, FSTP is concerned about an over reliance on principles based regulation (i.e. living within the ‘spirit of the rules’) in this area of Financial Services. Our clients operating in this arena are always looking for clarity and are generally welcoming of prescriptive rules in this area.
       
      Despite the introduction of formalised rules on product governance via MiFID II’s implementation in January 2018, distributor/manufacturer relationships and due diligence arrangements appear to be falling well short of regulatory expectations. We surmise that this is likely to result in a greater degree of regulatory intervention.
       
      The remuneration of individuals will attract the attention of the wider media and public as this situation develops. In this instance the Senior Managers and major beneficiaries of fees charged are one and the same. On the face of it there appears to be precious little individual accountability and a lack of challenge by others – the prevailing attitude seemingly being, “We pay ourselves what we think we are worth”. However, when that premise is built upon the investments of retail investors (bear in mind how much pension fund money will be tied up here) there has to be a day of reckoning. The message? If you are not providing retail investors with the service they have been led to expect, you cannot continue to reward yourselves so disproportionately. In short, Senior Managers must now be seen to be taking a more overt, moral stand on what is right and fair.
       
      Bailey was very strict to follow what he’s already told the media and the Committee’s Chair Nicky Morgan’s question, “Does anyone at the FCA read the papers and listen to what’s going on in the industry?” received a curt reply.
       
      The question, “Is it a failure of rules, or a failure of FCA supervision?” received a straight forward response of, “A failure of rules”, with Bailey’s reasoning being that whilst WIM has often had long periods of strong performance and long periods of poor performance, in this instance it is has not been able to save the situation, or the many reputations that have been tarnished as a result.
       
      The responsibilities of Link – the AFM for Woodford Funds – was centred on by Bailey who reiterated the regulatory contact that is now well publicised. The Committee observed that Link – previously owned by Capita – did not have a good record of managing Investment Managers on behalf of investors, given they were at the centre of the Arch Cru issues. (N.B. An article in the FT on 25 June alleges that the FCA pressured WIM into using the services of Link – as the largest provider of ACD services – in order for the necessary regulatory permissions to be granted).
       
      The relationship between WIM and Hargreaves Lansdown (HL) was raised by the Committee and it became obvious that once the immediate issue of fund liquidity is resolved, a review of the relationship between distributors and manufacturers will be instigated. (N.B at the Investment Association’s annual Policy Conference on Wednesday (26 June) Morgan remarked that the methodology behind Wealth 50’s composition raised questions as to whether customers are being treated fairly, after the TSC received a letter from HL confirming that its influential Wealth 50 list was not solely compiled on performance and that WIM’s inclusion on the list, despite under performance, was impacted by fee discounts offered to the platform).
       
      Justice for individuals
      A common theme throughout the discussion was ‘justice for individuals’. There is a high degree of dissatisfaction with the complexity of regulation and the consequent lack of clarity for consumers and practitioners alike, with the suggestion being made for the FCA to sort their impenetrable verbiage as most people don’t understand certain aspects such as T&Cs. This concept was understood by attendees from the FCA, who proceeded to mention that they do have enough resources to deal with all issues, and a review of systems and capabilities needs to be looked into.
       
      The FCA was forced to comment on its responsibilities under the Equality Act, bearing in mind TSC’s disappointment with the Regulator’s response to the report, ‘Consumers’ Access to Financial Services’, published by the Committee in May 2019. FCA’s Chairman, Charles Randell, stated that this is, “By no means us saying we don’t take our responsibility to consumer vulnerability very seriously”.
       
      Culture
      Culture was brought into question and Randell mentioned that the FCA’s focus is shifting to outcomes supported by principles. After some bad tempered exchanges Rushanara Ali, MP quipped, “Some would argue that you are not tough enough with bank bosses…are you too nice to bankers. Is it better to be feared, than liked or loved?” Bailey’s quick response of, “I don’t get up in the morning hoping people will love me”, will surely resonate for some time. He also added the FCA has 650 investigations currently underway, compared to the 250 when he took on the role.
       
      Brexit
      Of course, Brexit did rear its head and Bailey made frequent references throughout the discussion to the fact that regardless of the issues raised and the revisions suggested, Brexit will have a big impact on the FCA’s plans, such as the intended investment in data analytics. However there will be one area that can be assured of relatively no change post-Brexit, the Senior Managers & Certification Regime – it was made clear that the Regime will be implemented in its entirety.
       

       
      And finally....
       
      Overall, Randell (above left) and Bailey (above right) held their own against some intense questioning, but one wonders how much Bailey’s ambition to be the next Governor of the Bank of England tempered his responses.
       
      This was first published on the FTSP LLP blog.
    • Andy Milner
      By Andy Milner
      Interesting to read the information and response to Facebook's announcement last week.
       
      Even less hot headed commentators are saying that this could cause significant financial instability - if it gains traction.
       
       
      Facebook's Libra coin cryptocurrency, explained
      WWW.WIRED.CO.UK Facebook has finally revealed its cryptocurrency plans. Here's what you need to know about the Libra coin and the company's own Calibra wallet  
Debug
Debug info:
You may be asked to provide the below information to an AlgoMe administrator if you are facing any problems with the app:
appcms
modulepages
controllerpage
topics/forum ID64
page ID
PHP user agentCCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/)
ThemeAlgoMe v2.1.1a
Mobile appNO
Member ID
×

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy with this. For further information, see our Privacy Policy.