Jump to content
  • Luuk Jacobs
    Luuk Jacobs

    Sign in to follow this  

    Diversity – have we always got it wrong?

    Recently I‘ve been reading a lot of articles on diversity in general, and gender in particular, as well as attending conferences. At the CFA Alpha and Gender Diversity Conference, we were told it will take a further 61 years before we will have achieved gender parity in the workplace.

     

    While slow progress is being made, and the benefits have been scientifically researched and published – I have many more questions and the main one is – why aren’t we making more progress and faster?

     

    Is the focus for diversity in the workplace just a reaction to past high profile lawsuits on sex and race discrimination?  Could this be the reason companies favour the classic ‘command and control’ approach as a diversity strategy (the “do’s and don’ts”, like diversity training, diversity programmes, hiring tests, performance ratings and grievance)?

     

    Are ’Command and Control’ approaches ineffective due to a lack of engagement or motivation of employees/managers in solving the problem?

     

    How can diversity strategies really be effective in the workplace? Is engagement the key to solving the problem, exposing employees and managers to people from the different diversity groups, encouraging social accountability and holding unbiased views?

     

    A Harvard Business Review article sets out several strategies which really do work including recruitment, engagement, contact, social accountability and diversity task forces.

     

    For example, specific recruitment programmes with voluntary participation targeting elements of diversity (gender, race, age) creates cohesion, being part of a positive company message and a feeling of inclusion.

     

    Mentoring of minorities has proven to increase engagement and reduce bias towards them. A mentee becomes a protégé, and is helped and supported in their development and advancement.

     

    Bias can further be reduced through contact i.e. allowing people in different roles and functions to work on projects as equals or let management trainees rotate through departments. It breaks down stereotypes, leading to more equitable hiring and promotion.

     

    Social accountability is a technique in which you tap in the need to look good in the eyes of those around us. It can be achieved through creating transparency whereby for example a company publishes the average performance rating and pay rise by race and gender. Any previous existing differences tend to disappear within a short period.

     

    Diversity task forces discussing and investigating the issues underlying the lack of diversity, while designing the solutions, can have a significant positive impact. The task force members take the solutions back to their departments and manage implementation. As way of an example, a large accounting firm faced an issue in 1992, whereby despite the fact that 50% of the recruited employees were women, hardly any stayed on to become a partner. With a task force in place, the number of female partners increased to 14% in 8 years, by 2015 this had increased to 21% and the current global CEO is female.

     

    So clearly recruitment programs, mentoring, contact, social accountability, diversity task forces are clearly effective but currently not widely employed within businesses and hence improvement of diversity in the workplace will take time. The good news however is that we do know what works, so we just need to apply ourselves to do more of it.



    Sign in to follow this  

    Share this  

    Member Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.


  • Our picks

    • I've been trying to track down details on that statement from the CBI, but I'm not sure they elaborated on what the "unintended consequences" could be - I assume one could be wage inflation due to reduction in the negotiation advantage of the employer.
       
      Whether this is a bad thing is debatable when (by some measures) wage growth has been stagnant in the UK for longer than any time since the Napoleonic wars..
       
      Reality Check: Is pay growth the worst since Napoleon?
      WWW.BBC.CO.UK Reality Check examines the claim that real-wage growth is at its worst since the 18th Century.  
    • How do we solve the the Asset Management industry issues of today and tomorrow?
       
      We think we might just have the answer.
       
      When we created AlgoMe, we set out to empower professionals so they can manage their careers through technology, data and industry insight. With our career management platform, we‘ve delivered this but we know there‘s much more to be done.
       
      The Asset Management industry is in a state of flux. Right now lower fees, higher costs, new technology and increasing regulation, along with changes to the workforce, mean we need access to technology, data and industry insight more than ever before. This is why we‘re taking an exciting step by opening AlgoMe Community, the place that brings the Asset Management industry together to drive open conversation and essential innovation.
       
      AlgoMe Community is a members-only community exclusive to the industry and associated professions.
       
      Membership is free, members are verified and use their own names to create a profile – here are the key benefits:
       
      1. A community for Asset Management
      We have created a standalone space for asset managers meaning discussions and groups are centred around highly relevant areas and get to the heart of issues quickly. We will also be hosting regular events both online and offline to address industry challenges and help our members drive the agenda.
       
      2. Keep your finger on the pulse
      Not sure about Brexit or SMCR? Want to know what the latest research on AI is? The AlgoMe Community gives you direct access to all of these discussions. AlgoMe is working with a number of partner organisations to bring you the latest thought leadership, insights, blog posts and white papers to keep you abreast of the latest trends in Asset Management.
       
      3. Grow Your connections outside of your existing network
      There are a lot of bright minds out there. Over 40,000* people are currently working within the Asset Management industry according to the Investment Association. This number is likely to be 200k+ across Europe with the firms and organisations that make up Asset Management ecosystem. That’s a lot of new connections to make.
       
      4. Grow your personal brand
      Building your personal brand is critical to a successful career. AlgoMe Community gives you a platform to build your credibility and authority among your peers. It’s also easy to start your own blog to get ideas a wider audience and build up a following of other members.
       
      Join AlgoMe Community for free today and connect with the Asset Management industry.
        • Like
      • 0 replies
    • Revolt announced it will be offering ETFs to its customers....
      http://igniteseurope.com/c/2090843/247783/revolut_offering_bound_appeal_investors?referrer_module=emailMorningNews&module_order=3&code=WTI5c2FXNHVibWRBWVd4bmIyMWxMbU52YlN3Z01UQTROemN5TURRc0lERXlNVFV4TkRjMk5EWT0
      • 2 replies
  • Welcome to AlgoMe Community

    Join the community connecting the Investment Management industry and get access to insights, discussions and events.

    Sign up for free today.

  • Categories

  • Similar Content

    • Andy Milner
      By Andy Milner
      An interesting article from the New York Times on the importance of mentoring. It highlights the fact that having a mentor is less common than it used to be, which reflects AlgoMe's view due to the move away from traditional career structures and ladders.
       
      Why Mentoring Matters, and How to Get Started - The New York Times
      WWW.NYTIMES.COM Professional mentorships used to be the workplace norm, but today they’re hard to find, even though they matter more than ever. Here’s how to find one, and how to get the most from it.  
    • Luuk Jacobs
      By Luuk Jacobs
      Spring 2017 saw the introduction of a new and significant form of reporting on the Gender Pay Gap which will have wider implications for the evolution of the workplace and workforce.
       
      The new legislation requires employers with 250 or more employees to publish statutory calculations every year showing how large the pay gap is between their male and female employees independent of position. As a result, this will have a positive knock on effect of increasing gender equality in senior positions.
       
      Equal Pay and Gender Pay Gap
      First, don’t be confused about these two terms; Equal Pay and Gender Pay, they mean two very different things. Equal pay deals with the pay differences between individuals who do the same or similar jobs, or work of equal value. It’s unlawful to pay people unequally because they are a man or a woman therefore companies should ensure there is absolute equal pay for equal position.
       
      The gender pay gap however shows the differences in the average pay between all men and women in a company. If a workplace has a particularly high gender pay gap, this indicates there may be a number of inequality issues to deal with, and the individual calculations may help to identify what those issues are.
       
      Where are we now?
      The current UK gender pay gap is 18.1% and is at its lowest level ever (Justine Greening, UK minister for women and equalities). There is however a significant difference in industries and for example the figure for financial services is 39.5% (Elexica March 30, 2017).
       
      Before however jumping to conclusions, let’s try to understand how the calculations work.  The base calculations are:
      the hourly pay rates of all male full-pay relevant employees divided by the number of male full-pay employees and the same number for female full-pay relevant employees (ie the mean) equally from the above data, the difference between the midpoints in the ranges of men’s and women’s pay (ie the median)  
      You can reach the final figure by calculating the difference between the male and female pay, divided by the male pay and multiply it by 100.
       
      Put simply, if in an Asset Management firm, there are 10 female secretaries earning £10 per hour and 10 male fund managers earning £25 per hour, there is a mean pay gap of 60%. For Asset Management this figure is likely to be even higher for the bonus mean.
       
      What happens next?
      With the first official reporting due in April 2018, when companies publish their data and narrative, the possible course of action they will commit to in order to make the gender pay gap smaller will make very interesting reading.
       
      As we’ve already stated, equal pay for equal positions is bound by law, so it follows the main attribute of the gender pay gap is the way it highlights the unequal distribution of men and women in senior positions. Within the regulation, companies have the opportunity to further explain in a narrative the main reasons for the gender pay gap and this is likely to confirm this view.
       
      How do we solve this inequality?
      We are seeing an increasing number of women in senior positions through either (equal or even fast track) career progression or actively hiring women in more senior positions. With the last not a real macro solution as it would only reduce the pay gap in one company at the cost of the other.
       
      Research has already shown that career progression of women is often cut short by parental leave, care for parents as well as children (www.ILO.org “Women at Work, trends 2016”). So there need to be other elements tackled in parallel, and outside of the workplace, to ensure that women progress to higher paid (more senior) positions. Some solutions supporting this would be a comprehensive approach to harmonise work and family responsibilities by way of the introduction of (the legal possibility of) shared parental leave, free childcare either through government or companies direct and flexible working arrangements.
       
      What does the future hold?
      The Women’s Business Council has stated that by equalising the economic participation rates of men and women, the UK would add 10% to the size of the economy by 2030.
       
      What is not clear is the roadmap we need to take to reach this goal. It will be several years before the impact of the Gender Pay Gap reporting regulation becomes truly visible, what the key drivers for change are and also which companies are leading the charge.
       
      There is no doubt these leaders of change and reform will also be the most attractive to a changing (millennial) work force and it will be interesting to see what measures they take. The gender pay gap, or should we say “gender equality”, raises a further question on the increasing diversity of the workforce. In the next wave of regulation, should this reporting be extended to for example ethnicity, age, marital status or even sexuality? And would companies be willing to show this without regulation or at a minimum be willing to discuss it in the Board room?
       
      Only time will tell, but the first slew of reports published next year will reveal a reality which has been long hidden and hopefully shine a light on the road towards evolution in the workplace.
    • Luuk Jacobs
      By Luuk Jacobs
      There is no denying having a job is now intrinsic to modern existence. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has stated work has obvious economic benefits, but having a job also helps individuals stay connected with society, build self-esteem, and develop skills and competencies.
       
      In the UK, a larger than average proportion of the adult population is employed (73%), whereas the global average is 68%. Companies benefit greatly from a stable and happy workforce so when we created the AlgoMe Career Satisfaction Benchmark Report, we wanted to find out why people in our sector would leave their jobs and look for another one.
       
      What are the Triggers?
      The AlgoMe Career Satisfaction Benchmark Survey has identified a number of triggers which move people into job seeking mode; these span three areas which are personal reasons, industry drivers and company climate. These triggers should be on the radar of management who want to retain the best talent.
      The statistics breakdown as follows:
      40% are motivated personally to look for a new role by a change in career direction 25% are driven by industry reputation or kudos 33% by the climate of culture change within their organisation  
      How to manage staff turnover
      It is important for HR and management to develop contingency measures to keep teams stable and reduce churn. One route is to open up an ongoing dialogue which helps judge the mood of the company and attitudes towards change and reputation. Managers and HR professionals can use exit surveys or staff attitude to help them understand why people leave businesses. However, this is generally a case of too little too late – anticipating movement is far better than post-rationalisation.
       
      There are many reasons why people leave a company which creates a complex landscape to navigate but it’s possible to manage well. By being aware of these trigger moments earlier, management can concentrate on strategies which help stabilise people and keep them within the company.
       
      For example, in an individual case, if someone has managed to develop their skillset within your company, that makes them much more valuable to the organisation and elsewhere.  A proactive strategy to keep this person loyal would be to recognise their ambition and find them a new role to help them advance. This is a much more attractive option than having to replace them when they leave which means losing both their accrued knowledge of the organisation and the company investment into the individual.
       
      The AlgoMe Career Satisfaction Benchmark Survey is now out – download it now for great insights and advice 
×

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy with this. For further information, see our Privacy Policy.