Jump to content
  • Luuk Jacobs
    Luuk Jacobs

    Sign in to follow this  

    Data Science - fact or fiction?

      Time to read: 3min

    Have you found yourself relying on Siri for information or asking more questions of Alexa than you used to?  You are not alone. In our day to day lives we’ve become very accustomed to being provided with all kinds of information in milliseconds. We take it for granted and possibly don’t ask ourselves often enough, what the origin is of what is being thrown at us.


    In our industry we are already seeing evidence of businesses relying on data science and emerging technology. A 2017 report by the Financial Stability Board, pure-play AI and machine learning firms have managed assets of over $10 billion till 2017.  In 2019 there are many exciting opportunities for asset and wealth management firms exploiting financial data to create a competitive edge. From a skills perspective, there are many of us too who will be looking to find new opportunities ourselves and future-proof our careers with a bit of data savviness too.

     

    What does it all mean?

    If you don’t know your Alt data from your geospatial data or your IoT from GPU-accelerated statistics, you might be wondering - what exactly is data science?

     

    The classic definition of natural science is “the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment”. An important point here for me is the “Physical and Natural world” and although not always visible through my own eyes, I would argue we study the facts to create new knowledge.

    With data science, despite the association with science, the explanation of what it is, is slightly different i.e. an interdisciplinary field that uses scientific methods, processes, algorithms and systems to extract knowledge and insights from data in various forms, both structured and unstructured.

     

    So, methods, processes, algorithms and systems replace observation and experiment. Does that therefore mean that instead of taken natural facts as a base of science, facts become the resultant of data science? The challenge with science is that it is easy to find “interesting” patterns labelled as knowledge or insight where in fact none exist!  Humanity used to think that based on their observations the world was flat, by “experimenting” they discovered the world was round. Today we have the images of satellites to prove this. 

     

    This raises the question how we should judge whether a “pattern” is interesting? When should we worry about falsely labelling patterns “interesting”? (eg. mistranslation of a sentence vs. incorrect cancer diagnosis). 

     

    With the enormity of data having become available in the last let’s say 50 years, how much do we really know about what the patterns tell us, is the world of data maybe still in its flat phase and not round yet?

     

    Historically, a scientist would be leveraging existing natural sources and create new ones as needed in order to extract meaningful information and actionable insights.

     

    I would argue that although data scientists have created significant meaningful information which has serviced a many a good cause, for example in health and elderly care, equally however, data science is also being used to let people believe the earth is flat and the horizon shown is all there is to know (you have given a like to a post of a friend and before you know it, an ad is thrown at you to buy some (assumed) related product).

     

    In my view data science in general has still a way to go before the output of it can be completely trusted. We need to keep setting sail and independently try to discover what is over the horizon. Human intervention will almost always be necessary, especially when it comes to identifying anomalies and nuances. And of course, there will always be the occasional glitch – the Christmas day 2018 outage of Alexa is a prime example!

    • Like 3


    Sign in to follow this  

    Share this  

    Member Feedback



    Recommended Comments

    Become a member to read more and join the discussion

    Members can read and contribute to discussions

    Apply

    Register now for free access.

    Create your account

    Sign in

    Already a member? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Related Content

    • AlgoMe
      By AlgoMe
      AI and Data Science in Trading
      WWW.AIDATATRADING.CO.UK    
    • Jonathan Max
      By Jonathan Max
      AI is coming for you: One in three City of London jobs at risk from automation - CityAM
      WWW.CITYAM.COM More than one in three jobs in the City of London are under threat from automation, a study has found. [...]  
      The buzz this week has been back on Crypto; rising Bitcoin and the launch of Libra.
       
      Do you think that up to 33% of jobs could really be at risk from AI? - or has the Office of National Statistics overshot somewhat?
       
      Read our survey to find out more
       
    • AlgoMe
      By AlgoMe
      As more asset managers acquire –or develop- Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) solutions to maximise their alpha generation, market growth and operational cost reduction; it is clear that the industry needs to prepare to face the future challenges these solutions will bring when they become mainstream. 
       
      Are you prepared for AI implementation?
      Do not miss out on this unique opportunity to discuss how AI will impact key business areas while creating greater opportunities for the asset management community.
       
      https://www.theia.org/events-training/event?eventtemplate=204-techtalk-new-frontiers-how-ia-is-transforming-asset-management&event=416
       
    • Luuk Jacobs
      By Luuk Jacobs
      The event will be focused on data, operations, blockchain, compliance, legacy, regulation and AI.
       
      European FundTech Lab London, Spring 2019
      WWW.EVENTBRITE.COM Funds Europe in conjunction with Amundi Services, Calastone, Metrosoft, Milestone Group and Oracle will be hosting the fifth European FundTech Lab forum which will be taking place in London on Thursday, 16 May 2019...  
    • Luuk Jacobs
      By Luuk Jacobs
      The FCA has now recognised the increased use of big data and AI across the Investment Management and banking value change.  It is aiming to better understand the impact it has and will have, the benefits and harms and implications for regulation. One of their focus points in their 2019 Research agenda on the theme of technology, big data and artificial intelligence (AI) is the economics and ethics of this theme.
       
      The economics of the use of big data and AI in general are already quite well understood. They have changed the way of doing business and generating value enormously. Industries have been and continue to be disrupted; examples like Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Uber and even Microsoft have shown how the philosophy of platforms has moved us from single supplier mentality to open marketplaces.  These places where producers and consumers come together in interactions that create value for both parties, whether it is peer to peer or direct to consumer and disrupt the existing status quo.
       
      Platforms are not an entirely new phenomena as it has existed already in traditional open air market places around the world or for example in stock markets. What is new, is the addition of digital technology enabling platforms to enormously extend their reach, speed, convenience and efficiency.
       
      I would argue that the real impact of big data and AI has not hit Investment Management yet. Yes, there is robo-advice providing digital financial advice based on mathematical rules or algorithms (examples like Nutmeg). The majority of them however have been struggling to make their platform economically viable and according to a Deloitte report robo-advisers would need around £6bn assets under management to generate enough revenues to cover their costs. Nevertheless, also Investment Management is at the start of using big data, blockchain/ Distributed ledger technology and natural language processing. The benefits are seen already in better informing (investment) decisions, driving operational efficiency and fraud prevention and compliance.
       
      Arguably lesser known are the potential ethical impacts that will be associated with the use of these technologies while companies move from the traditional commercial yardsticks to include ethical and value-based decision making.
      The established players like Facebook and Alphabet (through the accusations of distributing fake news), Uber (sexual harassment and leadership style), AirBnB (destroyed properties from their users), have and continue to show that the ability to embed ethical awareness and decision making across functions will emerge to be a key attribute of successful digital organisations. The Investment Management industry is to be warned.
       
      Governments are stepping up (the FCA research agenda aims at looking at the implications on regulation) and, for example, GDPR is a first step. Nevertheless, the industry should not be waiting for governments and regulators to step in. I would argue that especially in an industry like Investment Management which is based on trust, companies that put ethics and morality front and centre of their organisation and especially with regards to big data and AI, are more likely to engender the trust of customers and differentiate themselves from competitors in the market.
       
      So what are the ethical questions ‘big data and AI’ that should be asked?  
       
      Can artificial intelligence exacerbate, hide and create unintended biases? Do network effects reduce competition and, in turn, impact consumer choice? How can we be accountable for big data? How do we define big data? How do we adjust risk management frameworks? What are the benefits and, more importantly who will benefit and who might be at risk by this?  
      According to Charles Ellis, CFA, and chair of the Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, the “biggest challenge” with regards to ethics for the investment management industry is to “find the pathway to reassert the dominance of the profession over the business”; an inherent conflict of interest in the Investment Management business as they are supposed to deliver financial performance both to their owners and their clients. 
       
      Regulation is in the end already in place and leaves little room for ambiguity ie to treat the clients in a fair and ethical way with the general principle to always put the clients’ interest first (AIFMD, UCITs IV and MiFID II).
       
      It is up to the industry now to ensure that these principles are followed and embedded when using big data and AI.  There is no magic pill for it yet, but the market shapers and early adopters will show how easy or difficult this might be.
Debug
Debug info:
You may be asked to provide the below information to an AlgoMe administrator if you are facing any problems with the app:
appcms
modulepages
controllerpage
topics/forum ID68
page ID
PHP user agentCCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/)
ThemeAlgoMe v2.1.1a
Mobile appNO
Member ID
×

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy with this. For further information, see our Privacy Policy.