Jump to content
  • Luuk Jacobs
    Luuk Jacobs

    Sign in to follow this  

    Career management – lessons to be learned from the World Cup

      Time to read: 6min

    Another World Cup has kicked off and will keep many glued to TV screens for the coming few weeks. The games will be filled with energy, excitement, passion and possibly drama on the pitch, as well as in front of the screen.

     

    While we spend all this time watching the games, what are the management lessons to be learned from the games?

     

    The role of manager for the top nations has become that of facilitator

    The role of star manager is out of step with the times. The manager of today is someone who can keep the camp in harmony and instil a world class playing style that mirrors what players are comfortable with at more local club level.

     

    Most club players have a packed annual agenda of national, international championships and Cup games leaving little time to prepare for the World Cup tournaments. This means there is a lot more skill and experience needed to bring together a group of disparate (and often fatigued) players into a world class winning team.

     

    Styles have changed to suit this. The German team have reached five consecutive semi-finals at major tournaments playing technical, passing football. But in many respects that has been less a result of a manager stamping his identity on a team and more about him responding to a generation of talented footballers that emerged following the country’s youth development revolution at the turn of the century. England and others have taken note and ditched star managers on huge salaries for investments in coaching, pitches and classrooms.

     

    Take stakeholder management seriously

    Thinking that the World Cup is all about the games, the supporters and the players would be under estimating who else has skin in the game. There are the national football associations, sponsors, host cities and their citizens, non-governmental organisations and probably many others.  This has implications when it comes to bad behaviour and hostility.

     

    Prior to and during the England-Russia match in Marseille, a well-organised group of Russian hooligans attacked English supporters. Their self-proclaimed goal was to capture the status of “hooligan culture capital” away from England. The initial response from Russian authorities ranged from passive mockery at the expense of English fans to blaming the tournament organisers for failing to ensure security.  Amid initial accusation that this behaviour was encouraged by the Russian authorities, the Kremlin took significant steps to clamp down on Russian hooligan organisations and the Russian football authorities have attempted to present a more favourable image of their local fans to the world.  Equally England has taken its own measures and seized the passports of known trouble makers.

     

    Having the biggest star on your team doesn’t mean you’ll win

    The days are of the star player are numbered. Many a country in the past and today have had the biggest football star in their team (Messi, Ronaldo, Cruyff, to mention only a few) but  have not brought back the big prize for their country.

     

    Contrary, a team like Germany in 2014 won the World Cup because the coach placed the burden, the expectations, and most importantly their confidence, on the whole team. There were definitely stars in the team but not just the one star around whom the team was built. The strength came from the collective of players and the fact that when one struggled another player would step up (by the way without mentioning it or taking public credit for it). Stars will only be at their best if you they are surrounded by a cultivated team mentality that leverages everyone’s strengths.

     

    Leaders need to be willing and able to make the big decisions

    As no doubt this World Cup will teach us you had better choose someone as leader who’s willing to make the big decisions. Whether it’s deciding to keep the fan favourite on the bench, place a young talent in your starting team, or change the team formation from a defensive to an attacking set up half-way through the tournament, it’s these decisions that win games and championships.

     

    You need a leader who has the confidence to make them and realise that a leader who will make big decisions is not the same as a leader who will make the right decisions. Without taking risk is part of the game as long as it is not a rash one;  constantly assesses the situation, making the quick calculations, and act.

     

    Sometimes a huge decision may backfire, but not making them would make it a losing game. That’s what leaders need to do and the it’s the same in the business world.

     

    Overcoming adversity with an abiding passion

    For some teams, morale is devastated after a defeat but for others, it is just part of the sport and something to learn from. This was not the case for the Spanish Squad in 2010. They started with a loss against Switzerland in the first game, but they were able to build up strength and win the championship. Germany, the incumbent World Champion, lost its first game but they are known for their  strong morale, collegiate atmosphere and a profound passion for how they wanted to get things done.

     

    Disappointing results are common in business, but you can only overcome them if you have the passion for what you do because often it is passion that drives an entrepreneur’s vision. Apple CEO Steve Jobs commented on the high number of internet start-ups during the 1990s in the following terms:

     

    Quote

     

    If they don’t really want to build a company, they won’t luck into it. That’s because it’s so hard that if you don’t have a passion, you’ll give up […] there are many moments that are filled with despair and agony, when you have to fire people and cancel things and deal with very difficult situations. That’s when you find out who you are and what your values are.

     

    Meanwhile the World Cup is nearly finalising the first round and some of the above lessons have been brought in practise already and have secured a team a place in the next round where the knock out stage will proof that these lessons are even more valuable, something all of us have equally experienced in our jobs or in interview processes.

     

    • Like 1


    Sign in to follow this  

    • Share this    
    Share this  

    Member Feedback



    Recommended Comments

    Be the first to comment.

    Become a member to read more and join the discussion

    Members can read and contribute to discussions

    Apply

    Register now for free access.

    Create your account

    Sign in

    Already a member? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Related Content

    • Jonathan Max
      By Jonathan Max
      I started at Lehman Brothers in 2005 in their HR team; they had been a client organisation of mine for a few years and was I extremely excited to be joining in the heady days of a raging bull market. While an industry contact had informed me of the potential role; there was the ‘standard’ interview process of seemingly meeting everyone. Did I really know what to expect or how to make the most of the opportunity? Not really is the honest answer.
       
      I learned how to progress my career as I went along; but, in truth was more focused on being accepted and delivering in what was a culturally unique organisation. I stayed at Lehman Brothers until it reached its dénouement in 2008. After the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, I transferred to Nomura and was again part of a fascinating journey with many twists and turns along the way. The market was clearly in a very different place; the next years were a seemingly endless journey of organisational ‘Re’....Restructuring, Realignment, Repositioning, Reorganisation and so on. I left Nomura in 2017 and now reflect on what I wish someone had told me in 2005 about career development; so I have summarised as follows: 
       
      Find a mentor
      My approach here was somewhat ad-hoc. I had a great relationship with my line manager and then an organisation change resulted in a different reporting line. To placate some pre-existing hostility between my former and new line manager; the safest route was to form a ‘mentoring relationship’ with my previous manager so I could still benefit from his considerable insight and advice. I developed several mentoring relationships; both within and outside the companies. A couple were more formal, the others less so but equally valuable. They were people with different backgrounds and experience who could share information and provide guidance. 
       
      Sun Microsystems undertook a body of research around its own mentoring programme, which came up with some very compelling results Mentors were promoted six times more often than those not in the programme; mentees were promoted five times more often than those not in the programme. Having mentoring in your early career is obviously going to speed up progress, but according to the Harvard Business Review article on mentoring “Everyone we spoke with over age 40 could name a mentor in his or her professional life, but younger people often could not”.  Therefore, to get ahead of the game and progress your career you need to think carefully about how to develop the right mentoring relationships and do this early on. Or, put another way, when you can gain practical advice and learn from the experience of others; why would you not seek mentoring relationships?  
       
      Join Networking Groups
      I founded what was to become the largest employee driven network at Nomura; comprising over 750 people in the UK and beyond and holding several events every month. So why did I do this? Because I thought it would be a bit of fun and with the support of my manager and head of diversity something that would bring a bit of variety to me professionally and personally. 
       
      With this decision, I completely missed the significant benefit this would have on my career. I was able to find new ways to navigate the organisation and find the find answers I needed. I had ‘friendly’ contacts in many departments; if they couldn’t help me they would point me in the right direction. As my day-to-day work became complex and involved working across several different groups and businesses; I had the right contacts to make things easier. I’m not saying you need to form a group but being part of internal and external networking groups is absolutely essential to successful career development. This article; 10 Important Benefits of Networking is a very accurate overview of why this needs to be part of your game-plan.
       
      Leverage the appraisal process
      I don’t think I was in a group of one in my early approach to appraisals and performance management. Typically, following a number of automated reminders, I would complete the mid-year or year-end process with seconds to spare and that was that until the next reminder arrived in my inbox. Most of the completion time was spend on ‘refreshing’ myself on the objectives I had set and then trying to recall enough information to make a decent attempt at well considered response.
       
      My advice here is embrace the appraisal process to your advantage as I started to do after realising how I could benefit from a more structured approach; how you evidence your achievements is just as important as how you determine your goals and where to focus your skills. Contrary to popular myth, a sense of entitlement on how your career should progress doesn’t work! What is truer is that management talk and discuss people; so make sure you are in the group of people that gets discussed for the right reasons and opportunities will come your way. Even if the traditional annual performance appraisal process is giving way to more frequent conversations between a manager and subordinate; make sure you are ready to have discussions about your future.

      Know your Industry
      Earlier on in my career, I was too focused on my immediate environment and in trying to deliver day-to-day. Therefore, my perspectives were too internalised, and I wasn’t able to draw on external sources for new or alternative perspectives. I started to change this; attending industry events; reading and learning to increase my understating of the industry and how different elements knitted together.
       
      What I didn’t realise immediately, is that managers are having to demonstrate this very thing to their superiors and don’t necessarily have the bandwidth to get into all the detail. Making yourself a ‘go-to person’ for information enhances your personal brand and with that you get to get involved in more interesting projects and assignments and hence career development is a beneficial consequence.

      As Abraham Lincoln said, "The best way to predict the future is to create it.", that’s not something you can leave for someone else to do if you want to progress your career.
    • Andy Milner
      By Andy Milner
      An interesting read from TheCityUK, which highlights the lack of diversity and need for more FinTech skills as being key challenges across FS.
       
      Financial Services Skills Taskforce - Interim report | TheCityUK
      WWW.THECITYUK.COM  
    • Jonathan Max
      By Jonathan Max
      https://www.theia.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/PolicyPaper-June2019.pdf
       
      Really interesting Policy Paper from the IA which certainly highlights the fundamental changes underway across the industry, particularly against a backdrop of increased regulation and technology disruption.
       
      Clearly the 'people' aspect is key, would be great to find out more about the Talent and D&I Strategy @gillian.painter?
       
       
    • Julia Kirkland
      By Julia Kirkland
      Guest blog from Julia Kirkland, Senior Partner at FSTP
      If you don’t know already, which of course you do, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) is EU legislation which first came into effect in 2007. It was created to regulate firms providing services to their clients which are linked to ‘financial instruments’, these being shares, bonds, units in collective investment schemes and derivatives. In addition, it covers the venues where those ‘financial instruments’ are traded.
       
      Fast forward 10 years or so and we have an updated version – MiFID II. This includes the revised MiFID and a new Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR). January 3, 2018 is the day MiFID II must be implemented across Europe.
       
      Now we’re on the cusp of this deadline, the thorny and sensitive topic of Knowledge and Competence (K&C) is bubbling up as a major concern across the industry.  We’ve spoken with numerous firms in both the Asset Management and Wealth Management sectors and they have one thing in common; they’re all grappling with the assessment of competence of information providers.
       
      Who is in scope? 
      In Asset Management, this may cover a wide range of roles from sales teams, client services, broker servicing staff to Portfolio Managers (the really sensitive aspect of K&C). Managers may struggle with the fact they must tell a Portfolio Manager of 20 years plus who hasn’t got a formal qualification, they need to be assessed as competent and in a very short timeframe too.
       
      In Wealth, the scope may cover desk assistants, team secretaries and portfolio assistants who may all be in direct contact with clients, giving them information about prices, valuations, charges and providing generic market or sector views. Additionally, research teams who might attend meetings with clients to provide market, sector or stock views on a non-advised basis may fall under this too. Most of the firms we are speaking to are including research teams. Most of the above staff members have never been included in formal K&C Schemes before but this has changed.
       
      What happens in 2018?
      As it stands, information providers not assessed by January 3 will need to be supervised in their activities and oversight of any client interaction must be in place. If you’re not prepared, January 2018 is fast approaching and maybe it’s time to look outside your company for third party support and assistance.
       
      Our guest blogger Julia Kirkland, is Senior Partner, FSTP
      FSTP is a training solution provider with expertise in MiFID II and the company also runs workshops to cover Wealth and Asset Management to meet the ESMA requirements and provides advanced K&C assessments for more seasoned, professional staff.
    • Jonathan Max
      By Jonathan Max
      Really interesting article from HRB on whether Men and Women needed different kinds of networks to succeed following a study on the networks of male and female MBAs suggests that males being successful in the workforce was largely dependent on being active in a social network where as women often also sough an 'inner circle' in addition to a broader network. 
       
      Would be great to hear what our MBS/MSc members think?
       
      Research: Men and Women Need Different Kinds of Networks to Succeed
      HBR.ORG Results from a study of MBAs.  
       
       
Debug
Debug info:
You may be asked to provide the below information to an AlgoMe administrator if you are facing any problems with the app:
appcms
modulepages
controllerpage
topics/forum ID2
page ID
PHP user agentCCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/)
ThemeAlgoMe v2.1.5
Mobile appNO
Member ID
×

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. If you continue, we’ll assume you are happy with this. For further information, see our Privacy Policy.